With matches being played across the United States, Canada and Mexico, heat and humidity was always going to be an issue at the World Cup.
FIFA introduced three-minute hydration breaks in each half at the halfway mark due to sweltering temperatures but the changes have been met with mixed reviews as many fans pointed out that many matches are air-conditioned or played at regular temperatures.
Supporters have pushed the idea that these breaks are purely used to make money, something that has been met with outrage online.
Speaking on Betfair’s Hot Take Hotline, one fan said: “These new hydration breaks are ridiculous. They totally break the rhythm of the game.”
Shearer agreed as he ripped into the breaks which he believes are completely unnecessary.
“I totally agree with that. For players safety, when it’s too hot, yes, absolutely have a hydration break. But, an example, England’s game was air-conditioned. 21 degrees. Perfect temperature with a roof over. So, there is absolutely no need for players’ welfare to have a hydration break.
“We all know what they’re for. We all know why they have brought them in. And the vast majority of time, unfortunately, it’s not for player welfare. It’s for adverts.”
The breaks have disrupted the momentum of matches, brought heavy criticism from managers and players and even boos during England’s clash with Croatia as fans make their voices heard.