Birmingham boss McLeish makes legal threat over West Ham push for Ridgewell, Larsson
Birmingham City boss Alex McLeish has warned West Ham United over their pursuit of Liam Ridgewell and Sebastian Larsson.
The Daily Mail says new West Ham owner David Sullivan has intimated that he is interested in luring both of his former players to Upton Park at the end of the season by trying to take advantage of a perceived loophole in their contract situation at St Andrews.
The contracts of Larsson and Ridgewell expire at the end of the current season, with Birmingham holding a further 12-month option on both players.
"This in the man that did the contracts in the first place. They used them year-in, year-out at Birmingham," said McLeish.
"I don't know why they think they are not recognised by FIFA, but if someone wants to challenge it it will be four or five years before it is resolved.
"There will be lawyers and all kinds of paper work. It is not going to be ratified in 24 hours after one call to FIFA.
"Our contracts are approved by the Premier League and for someone to challenge them it would be a protracted and drawn out affair. So they are welcome to try."
Tribalfootball Store
- home
- News
- Leagues
- A-League
- Argentine Primera División
- English Premier League
- Football League One
- French Ligue 2
- German Bundesliga 2
- Scottish Premier League
- Swiss Challenge League
- Swiss Super League
- Belgian First Division
- Brazil Serie B
- Campeonato Brasileiro Série A
- Chinese Super League
- English Championship
- Eredivisie
- German Bundesliga
- Italian Serie A
- Italian Serie B
- Italian Serie C1
- J-League
- Ligue 1
- MLS
- Portuguese Liga
- Prva HNL
- Russian Premier League
- Segunda División
- Segunda División B
- Spanish Liga
- Super League Greece
- Turkish Super Lig
- transfer news
- Results & Fixtures
- football store
- video games
Results & Fixtures
Matches
| Home | Away | Score | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fri Feb 17th | |||
| Reading | Burnley | - | 20:00 |
| Sat Feb 18th | |||
| Crystal Palace | Watford | - | 15:00 |
| Leeds United | Doncaster Rovers | - | 15:00 |
| Hull City | Brighton & Hove Albion | - | 15:00 |
| Millwall | Middlesbrough | - | 15:00 |
| Peterborough United | Bristol City | - | 15:00 |
| Barnsley | Portsmouth | - | 15:00 |
| Ipswich Town | Cardiff City | - | 15:00 |
| Reading | Burnley | - | 15:00 |
| Nottingham Forest | Coventry City | - | 15:00 |
| Southampton | Derby County | - | 15:00 |
| Blackpool | West Ham United | - | 15:00 |
| Leicester City | Birmingham City | - | 15:00 |
| Tue Feb 21st | |||
| Millwall | Middlesbrough | - | 19:45 |
| Blackpool | West Ham United | - | 20:00 |
| Wed Feb 22nd | |||
| Hull City | Brighton & Hove Albion | - | 19:45 |
| Tue Mar 13th | |||
| Leicester City | Birmingham City | - | 19:45 |
Tables
| Team | P | W | D | L | GD | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West Ham United | 30 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 57 |
| Southampton | 31 | 16 | 8 | 7 | 22 | 56 |
| Cardiff City | 31 | 14 | 11 | 6 | 14 | 53 |
| Blackpool | 31 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 14 | 52 |
| Birmingham City | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 20 | 51 |
| Reading | 30 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 51 |
| Hull City | 30 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 50 |
| Middlesbrough | 30 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 50 |
| Brighton & Hove Albion | 31 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 49 |
| Burnley | 31 | 14 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 47 |
| Leeds United | 31 | 13 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 45 |
| Leicester City | 31 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 42 |
| Derby County | 30 | 12 | 6 | 12 | -4 | 42 |
| Crystal Palace | 30 | 10 | 10 | 10 | -1 | 40 |
| Watford | 31 | 10 | 10 | 11 | -7 | 40 |
| Barnsley | 30 | 11 | 6 | 13 | -6 | 39 |
| Ipswich Town | 30 | 11 | 4 | 15 | -10 | 37 |
| Portsmouth | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 35 |
| Peterborough United | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | -4 | 34 |
| Millwall | 31 | 7 | 10 | 14 | -11 | 31 |
| Bristol City | 31 | 8 | 7 | 16 | -19 | 31 |
| Coventry City | 31 | 6 | 7 | 18 | -16 | 25 |
| Nottingham Forest | 30 | 7 | 4 | 19 | -25 | 25 |
| Doncaster Rovers | 29 | 6 | 6 | 17 | -24 | 24 |
Related Stories
- Feb 06 West Ham striker Piquionne missed Fulham, Sunderland January move
- Feb 01 WINTER TRANSFER MARKET: Premier League permanent deals
- Feb 15 Chelsea boss Villas-Boas may not risk Terry against Birmingham
- Feb 14 Middlesbrough join battle for Swansea striker Dobbie
- Feb 14 West Ham boss Allardyce will introduce ex-Man Utd starlet Morrison slowly
Popular Stories
- Feb 14 Ronaldo hands Florentino Real Madrid contract nightmare
- Feb 14 Real Madrid coach Mourinho prepared to replace Casillas with new keeper signing
- Feb 14 Man Utd agreement for Gaitan still watertight with Benfica
- Feb 14 Man City rebel Tevez: Man Utd stars, Ferguson are the BEST!
- Feb 14 Chelsea players attacked AVB, Cech in crisis meeting


Comments (2)
the loophole is that their contract includes the optional year. so it will be the players decision if they want to stay or go, the contracts are legally up in the summer, but both club and player can take the optional year but it works mostly in the players favour, i think they will both leave. Bigger club/London etc, you cant blame them can you.
He's not threatening them with legal action he's telling them that their will be legal action if they tried to sign our players. I thought he was just going to try and sign them when they were 'free agaents' which is what they are in the Summer so what's this about a loophole?
Post new comment